Home arrow Support arrow Articles of Interest arrow Louder Is Not Better
Louder Is Not Better PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 6
PoorBest 
Contributed by chino   

How Speakers and PA Systems Respond 

If you ever went to an outdoors event like a street fair, where recorded music was being played, chances are it didn't sound that good.

The music simply has no reflection and bass frequencies are not felt that well.

A record that was mastered with a minimum compromise on the dynamics will sound much better than the record that had its dynamic range squashed (A very loud record).

Why? The human ear perceive much better mid frequencies (Between 800Hz to 5 kHz or so), and most of those squashed records have mild distortion on the mid frequencies and I’d like to add that they move no bass frequencies at all.

That doesn't mean that there are no bass frequencies in them; it means that the sound of these bass frequencies were flattened and therefore there is hardly any speaker movement.

When the music is blasted, the record with the fuller dynamics will sound best.

Speaker movement.- every speaker has a cone that has "excursions", which is a response to certain low frequencies, the more the cone travels or expands outwards, the more air it will "pump".

Excursion.- A movement from and back to a mean position or axis in an oscillating or alternating motion.

A record with high peaks on the bass frequencies will generate longer excursions to the speaker cone. Read on 

If you are still not convinced, let’s take this theory to the other end. Let’s say you are now in a nightclub.

The music is being blasted by high power amp systems (10,000 watts or more) and your mix (Pay attention hip-hop people) sounds good and loud, but then comes other mix and WOW, now that’s a great and exciting sound. 

Nothing wrong with yours, after all, you heard it in your car and it sounded fat and louder than the others, hmm, but why did that mix sound better?

You get a hold of a copy of the same mix that was played, you take it to your car and the truth is revealed; that mix is lower in volume but fuller with dynamics! 

Of course, in club terms, a DJ is supposed to level the music as he makes his transition from record to record, so what’s happening is, the mix that was louder and fading out of the DJ’s main mix, is being replaced at equal power by the one with superior dynamics and even though this mix is a lower RMS (By 2 dBs, or so) it was leveled by the DJ as he mixed it in: and since it had more kick due to the low frequency transients, it had therefore, more speaker movement than the other.

See example 1: The cone expands longer and pushes more air density. Check the shape of that excursion from the dynamics point of view at the bottom of the pic.

 

The average level of this signal is about -2 dBFS

 

Now, look at example 2:

Even though the louder signal is more than 2 dB louder in average , it doesn't creates much of a movement to the cone and therefore not much air displacement (The distance of the oscillating body of air in the room from its central position).

And, although they both have plenty of RMS power, example one is for sure more dynamic.

Now, see the bottom of the pic on example 2. It looks like the shape of the dynamics is nothing but a big block of flattened frequencies.

 

 

The average level of this signal is about -0 dBFS

 

For some of you, this is not even an issue since only a mad mastering engineer will master a pop ballad or a soundtrack instrumental like a grunge, metal or hip hop record, right?

Let’s hope not.

Edward Vinatea
Chief Mastering Engineer
MusicMasteringOnLine.com

New York 

Monday, December 1, 2008
Who's Online
We have 24 guests online
Statistics
Visitors: 3361248