Change font size   E-mail friend   Print view

Is 96khz better than 48?

(1~10 iShares). Here mastering engineers can discuss mastering related topics. Moderated by Chris Chetland and Edward Vinatea.

Moderator: Moderator

Is 96khz better than 48?

Postby Montgomery » Sat Jul 08, 2017 3:21 pm

I record at 48/24 all the time and sound real good to me. I tried 96khz but didn't hear any difference in the end and it consumed almost all my disk capacity. What good is 96khz???

Thank you wise people.
anonymous users

iShares on hand: Locked
  • Register

  • Return to Mastering Forum

    Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: adg, AdsBot [Google], Ask Jeeves [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], dagoosemusic, Dingbat, DMS [Bot], draudiolabs, euphonicmasters, Fin-mastering, georgetown, Gigabot [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Desktop, Google Feedfetcher, GreggHermetech, HadrielHay-Mastering, hatchettemastering, Heise IT-Markt [Crawler], Heritrix [Crawler], Iamstudio, ICCrawler - ICjobs, ichiro [Crawler], karibumastering, leckel1996, lrsmastering, masterlab, metropolis, mp-masterizacao, MSN [Bot], MSN NewsBlogs, MSNbot Media, noteon, Nutch [Bot], Odeon-Mastering, PasoStudio73, petaipan, PHANTOM, razik, red-mastering, SaintpidMastering, salt-mastering, Sensis [Crawler], Seoma [Crawler], SEOSearch [Crawler], siddusom, sinebox, Steeler [Crawler], subsequent, sweetsoundsnyc, teebaum, Telekom [Bot], Teletoby, terranova, the-exchange, Varibeat,, W3 [Sitesearch], W3C [Linkcheck], WaltzMastering, YaCy [Bot], Yahoo [Bot], Yahoo MMCrawler [Bot] and 0 guests