Change font size   E-mail friend   Print view

Is 96khz better than 48?

(1~10 iShares). Here mastering engineers can discuss mastering related topics. Moderated by Chris Chetland and Edward Vinatea.

Moderator: Moderator

Is 96khz better than 48?

Postby Montgomery » Sat Jul 08, 2017 3:21 pm

I record at 48/24 all the time and sound real good to me. I tried 96khz but didn't hear any difference in the end and it consumed almost all my disk capacity. What good is 96khz???

Thank you wise people.
anonymous users

iShares on hand: Locked
  • Register

  • Re: Is 96khz better than 48?

    Postby EV-Sonic-Lab » Mon Jul 31, 2017 12:11 am

    Don't get hung up on hi sampling frequency rates. When you know how to mix or master, even working at 44.1kHz you should obtain professional results...
    User avatar
    Studio Owner
    Studio Owner
    Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2017 11:23 pm
    Posts: 2
    Has Liked: 0 post
    Liked in: 0 post
    iShares on hand: 47.05
    Transfer iShares
    Post Relevance: 
  • Register

  • Return to Mastering Forum

    Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: AMS, andredb, Ask Jeeves [Bot], Baidu [Spider], BrianLucey, brmastering, CPM, dagoosemusic, DMS [Bot], Ed_Littman_Mastering, Exabot [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Guillermo, Heise IT-Markt [Crawler], JamminMasters, Jvfmastering, karibumastering, Kog, lbmastering, leckel1996, masterlab, mastervargas, morrisonstudios, MSN [Bot], MSN NewsBlogs, Odeon-Mastering, psbot [Picsearch], RaySr, razik, SEO Crawler, siddusom, SolidMastering, Sterling-Sound, teebaum, the-exchange, tl-mastering,, Voyager [Bot], Yahoo [Bot], Yahoo MMCrawler [Bot], zeitgeist and 1 guest