Change font size  

Is 96khz better than 48?

Post a reply

In an effort to prevent automatic submissions, we require that you enter both of the words displayed into the text field underneath.
:dlike :S :D :) :thumb ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review

Expand view Topic review: Is 96khz better than 48?

Re: Is 96khz better than 48?

Post by EV-Sonic-Lab » Mon Jul 31, 2017 12:11 am

Don't get hung up on hi sampling frequency rates. When you know how to mix or master, even working at 44.1kHz you should obtain professional results...

Is 96khz better than 48?

Post by Montgomery » Sat Jul 08, 2017 3:21 pm

I record at 48/24 all the time and sound real good to me. I tried 96khz but didn't hear any difference in the end and it consumed almost all my disk capacity. What good is 96khz???

Thank you wise people.