Change font size   Print view

Is 96khz better than 48?

(1~10 iShares). Here mastering engineers can discuss mastering related topics. Moderated by Chris Chetland and Edward Vinatea.

Moderator: Moderator

Is 96khz better than 48?

Postby Montgomery » Sat Jul 08, 2017 10:21 am

I record at 48/24 all the time and sound real good to me. I tried 96khz but didn't hear any difference in the end and it consumed almost all my disk capacity. What good is 96khz???

Thank you wise people.
anonymous users

iShares on hand: Locked

Re: Is 96khz better than 48?

Postby EV-Sonic-Lab » Sun Jul 30, 2017 7:11 pm

Don't get hung up on hi sampling frequency rates. When you know how to mix or master, even working at 44.1kHz you should obtain professional results...
User avatar
Studio Owner
Studio Owner
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2017 6:23 pm
Posts: 3
Has Liked: 1 post
Liked in: 0 post
iShares on hand: 60.99
Transfer iShares
Post Relevance: 

Return to Mastering Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 21mastering, aleatoric, Alexa [Bot], analogdimension, AudiobyRay-Mastering, Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], blackler, calyx-mastering, Exabot [Bot], Heise IT-Markt [Crawler], howiew, Iamstudio, JamminMasters, karibumastering, lbmastering, leckel1996, MSN NewsBlogs, Odeon-Mastering, onlinemusicians, PasoStudio73, Patra26, red-mastering, reveramastering, siddusom, Steeler [Crawler], Sterling-Sound, Telekom [Bot], Voyager [Bot], W3 [Sitesearch], Yahoo MMCrawler [Bot], Yahoo Slurp [Bot] and 0 guests